Strategic planning: A transdisciplinary analysis of Ukraine's experience for states with high security risks

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58594/rtest.v6i3.146

Keywords:

Strategic planning, security and defence, multidomain operations, capability-based planning, risk management, resilience, security governance

Abstract

The transformation of the international security environment has highlighted the need to reconsider traditional approaches to strategic planning. The purpose of this study is to conduct a transdisciplinary analysis of Ukraine's experience in strategic planning during full-scale war and to identify conceptual approaches, institutional mechanisms, and practical lessons that can be adapted by states facing high levels of contemporary security risks. In this research, strategic planning represents the process of strategy development as a course of action that orchestrates strategic ends, ways, and means in order to accomplish higher national political objectives. For Ukraine, the latter were consolidated exclusively into the preservation of Ukrainian national statehood and the creation of conditions for enduring and just peace. The research employs a qualitative methodology based on comparative analysis, systems analysis, institutional analysis, and synthesis of contemporary academic literature on defence planning, capability development, multidomain operations, and strategic resource management. The findings demonstrate that effective strategic planning should be understood as an adaptive governance system integrating strategic security environment analysis, capability-based and risk-oriented planning, multidomain operations, strategic resource governance, whole-of-government and whole-of-society coordination, and international interoperability. Based on these findings, the study proposes the Transdisciplinary Strategic Planning Framework for High-Risk States, which integrates six mutually reinforcing dimensions into a unified analytical model. The study argues that Ukraine's wartime experience should be regarded not only as a national case of defence adaptation but also as a valuable source of transferable strategic principles for countries confronting military, hybrid, cyber, and transnational security threats.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cardwell, P. J., & Moret, E. (2023). The EU, sanctions and regional leadership. European Security, 32(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2085997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2085997

Dragan, I., Panfilova, T., Chistiakova, I., & Tatarinov, R. (2025). Public-private partnerships in national security: A case study in the context of the war in Ukraine (2022–2024). Clio. Revista de Historia, Ciencias Humanas y Pensamiento Crítico, 5(9), 599–631. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14566958

Evangelista, M. (2024). A nuclear umbrella for Ukraine? Precedents and possibilities for postwar European security. International Security, 48(3), 7–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00476

Fedorchak, V. (2024). The Russia–Ukraine war: Towards resilient fighting power. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003351641

Fiott, D. (2023). In every crisis an opportunity? European Union integration in defence and the war on Ukraine. Journal of European Integration, 45(3), 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2183395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2183395

Genini, D. (2025). How the war in Ukraine has transformed the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy. Yearbook of European Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yeaf003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yeaf003

Götz, E., & Staun, J. (2022). Why Russia attacked Ukraine: Strategic culture and radicalized narratives. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(3), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2082633 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2082633

Helwig, N. (2023). EU strategic autonomy after the Russian invasion of Ukraine: Europe’s capacity to act in times of war. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(S1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13527 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13527

Horbatiuk, V., Horhulenko, V., Horhulenko, V., Dobrovolskyi, Y., & Samsonenko, M. (2025). Recommendations on the implementation of defence planning measures for acquiring and developing capabilities by the prospective cyber forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine based on the DOTMLPFI. International Scientific Journal Military Science, 3(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.62524/msj.2025.3.2.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62524/msj.2025.3.2.10

Ignatiev, A., Burlakov, S., Terletskii, A., & Skryl, S. (2025). Assessing modern challenges and threats affecting national security by full-scale military operations. DIXI, 27(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-5891.2025.02.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-5891.2025.02.02

Ketners, K. (2025). Adaptation of state security to modern military operations and terrorist risks in the world. Space and Culture, India, 13(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.20896/e3p2jm77 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20896/e3p2jm77

Kotlyar, Y., & Lymar, M. (2025). Ukraine as a shield for Europe: The Russian invasion and the reshaping of international security. Acta de Historia & Politica: Saeculum XXI, 10, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.26693/ahpsxxi2025.10.075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26693/ahpsxxi2025.10.075

Kurashkevych, A., & Tushko, D. (2025). Analysis of foreign experience in capability-based operational planning of border security units of NATO member and partner countries. Naukovyi Visnyk Kyivskoho Instytutu Natsionalnoi Hvardii Ukrainy, 2, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.59226/2786-6920.2.2025.88-94 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59226/2786-6920.2.2025.88-94

Lutsyk, Y., Parkhomenko, P., Demeniev, O., & Alimov, D. (2023). Analysis of the defence planning system based on capabilities taking into account the leading experience of NATO member states. Modern Economics, 41, 73–78. https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.v41(2023)-11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.V41(2023)-11

Masitoh, Y. T., Perwita, A. A. B., & Rudy, E. (2025). Integrated deterrence in practice: The 2022 United States National Defence Strategy towards the Russia–Ukraine war. International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences, 3(3), 1030–1048. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijhess.v3i3.7317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58578/ijhess.v3i3.7317

Pashchenko, Y. M., & Ivashchenko, S. (2023). Concepts and principles of risk management in the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine and the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 2(77), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2023.77.2.17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2023.77.2.17

Petrukha, N. M., Petrukha, S. V., Tiurmenko, Y. M., & Kononenko, I. M. (2025). Strategic management of financial and material resources in security and defence projects. The Problems of Economy, 63(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2025-1-81-89 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2025-1-81-89

Reznikova, O. (2022). Strategic analysis of Ukraine’s security environment. Strategic Panorama, Special Issue, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.53679/2616-9460.specialissue.2022.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53679/2616-9460.specialissue.2022.05

Reznikova, O., Hryhorenko, O., & Myronenko, V. (2024). Transformation of the strategic culture of Ukraine under the influence of the Russian threat. Politologija, 116(4), 59–108. https://doi.org/10.15388/Polit.2024.116.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/Polit.2024.116.2

Roelsgaard Obling, A., Berndtsson, J., & Gilje Ostensen, A. (2026). Conceptualising total defence: Inter-organisational structures in a comparative perspective. European Security. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2026.2620708 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2026.2620708

Rohulia, A., Taran, Y., Tymoshenko, O., Bereziuk, V., & Nianko, V. (2025). Ensuring security in crisis: Risk mitigation strategies and response planning. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(12s). https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i12s.1861 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i12s.1861

Semenenko, O., Koval, V., Vodchyts, O., & Dobrovolskyi, Y. (2024). A multidomain operation: A modern view of the forms and methods of military operations adapting to the environment of transforming challenges and threats. International Scientific Journal Military Science, 2(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.62524/msj.2024.2.1.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62524/msj.2024.2.1.02

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

How to Cite

Bielska, T., & Shkoliarenko, V. (2026). Strategic planning: A transdisciplinary analysis of Ukraine’s experience for states with high security risks. Revista Transdiciplinaria De Estudios Sociales Y Tecnológicos, 6(3), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.58594/rtest.v6i3.146

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Ciencia y sociedad ante los desafíos humanos, tecnológicos y ambientales del presente (Septiembre-diciembre)

Section

Artículos

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Tetiana Bielska, Vasyl Shkoliarenko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in Revista Transdisciplinaria de Estudios Sociales y Tecnológicos (RTEST), agree to the following terms:

1. Copyright

Authors retain unrestricted copyright to their work. Authors grant the journal the right of first publication. To this end, they assign the journal non-exclusive exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication, and transformation). Authors may enter into additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal, provided that acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal is given.

© The authors.

2. License

The articles are published in the journal under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). The terms can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en

This license allows:

  • Sharing: Copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format.
  • Adapting: Remixing, transforming, and building upon the material.

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes were made. You may do this in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses or sponsors your use.
  • NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  • ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your creation under the same license as the original work.

There are no additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.