The Russian Orthodox Church as a geopolitical instrument of Russia’s foreign policy in the Black Sea region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58594/rtest.v6i1.210Palavras-chave:
Russian foreign policy, Russian Orthodox Church, Black Sea Region, Hybrid Warfare, Russkiy Mir, Religious Diplomacy, Orthodoxy, Propaganda, Soft PowerResumo
This article critically examines the instrumentalization of the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) by the Russian state as part of its foreign policy in the Black Sea region. While the Russian Federation is constitutionally secular, the Moscow Patriarchate functions as a de facto strategic partner of the Kremlin, projecting religious soft power and legitimizing geopolitical objectives. Drawing on primary and secondary sources, this study situates the ROC within the evolution of Russian state–church relations from the imperial period to the post-Soviet era. It highlights how the ROC advances the Russkiy mir (“Russian World”) ideology, intervenes in the ecclesiastical affairs of neighboring Orthodox states, and amplifies Kremlin narratives in international fora under the guise of defending religious freedom and traditional values. Case studies from Ukraine and Georgia illustrate the Church’s complicity in legitimizing occupation, undermining canonical order, and disseminating propaganda aligned with hybrid warfare strategies. In the Balkans, the ROC leverages Orthodox “brotherhood” to foster anti-Western sentiment and bolster Russia’s influence. Findings suggest that the ROC has become an indispensable instrument of Russia’s hybrid strategy, with profound implications for the sovereignty of Orthodox-majority states, European security, and the international order.
Downloads
Referências
Carnegie Endowment. (2019). Russia’s game in the Balkans. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2019/02/russias-game-in-the-balkans?lang=en
Ekathimerini. (2016). Greece and Russia: Cooperation for peace and prosperity. https://www.ekathimerini.com/opinion/208991/greece-and-russia-cooperation-for-peace-and-prosperity/
Georgian National Committee of the Blue Shield. (2014). Appeal to international organisations concerning the protection of cultural heritage in the occupied territories of Georgia. http://blueshield.ge/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Appeal-to-international-organisations-24.03.2014-ENG.pdf
GlobalSecurity.org. (2025). Privileged interests in Russia. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/privileged-interests.htm
Greek City Times. (2021). Lavrov attacks Patriarch Bartholomew. https://greekcitytimes.com/2021/01/19/lavrov-bartholomew-orthodoxy/
Holy Council. (2016). Mission of the Orthodox Church in today’s world. https://www.holycouncil.org/-/mission-orthodox-church-todays-world
International Foundation for the Unity of Orthodox Christian Nations. (2010). International Foundation for the Unity of Orthodox Christian Nations prize awarding ceremony. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/6758
Kajosevic, S. (2020). Russian-backed bishop joins Montenegro church protests. https://balkaninsight.com/2020/02/26/russian-backed-bishop-joins-montenegro-church-protests/
Kavkazsky Uzel. (2010). Georgia requests to save Ilori Church in Abkhazia. http://www.kavkaz-uzel.ru/articles/177930/
Kremlin.ru. (2000). National security concept of the Russian Federation. http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/14927
Krotov.info. (1943). Council for the affairs of the Russian Orthodox Church. http://krotov.info/acts/20/1940/19430904.html
Lutsevych, O. (2016). Agents of the Russian World: Proxy groups in the contested neighborhood. Chatham House.
National Interest. (2020). The political role of the Russian Orthodox Church. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/political-role-russian-orthodox-church-97647
NBC News. (2014). Meet the Russian Orthodox Army. https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/ukraine-crisis/meet-russian-orthodox-army-ukrainian-separatists-shock-troops-n107426
New Eastern Europe. (2016). Orthodox radicalism in Eastern Ukraine: Lessons for Belarus. https://neweasterneurope.eu/2016/12/12/orthodox-radicalism-in-eastern-ukraine-lessons-for-belarus/
New York Times. (2016). In Expanding Russian Influence, Faith Combines With Firepower. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/14/world/europe/russia-orthodox-church.html
Pertsev, A. (2017). President and patriarch: What Putin wants from the Orthodox Church. Russian Ideology. https://carnegie.ru/commentary/75058
Shkarovskiy, S. (2013). The Russian Orthodox Church in Soviet politics. Acta Slavica Iaponica, 27, 1–28. Hokkaido University. http://src-h.slav.hokudai.ac.jp/publictn/acta/27/01Shkarovskiy.pdf
Solarz, A. M., & Korniichuk, I. (2023). The Reactions of Orthodox Churches to Russia’s Aggression towards Ukraine in the Light of the Postsecular Approach to IR Studies. Religions, 14(4), 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14040515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14040515
State Duma of the Russian Federation. (2020). Constitution of the Russian Federation. http://www.constitution.ru/en/10003000-02.htm
Stoeckl, K. (2016). The Russian Orthodox Church and human rights. Routledge.
Suslov, M. (2018). The Russian world: Russia’s soft power and geopolitical imagination. Politics, Religion & Ideology, 19(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2018.1453754
U.S. Department of State. (2016). International religious freedom report: Georgia. https://www.state.gov/reports/2016-report-on-international-religious-freedom/georgia/
UNHCR. (2014). Country reports on human rights practices – Georgia. https://www.refworld.org/docid/559bd56928.html
Van Herpen, M. H. (2016). Putin’s propaganda machine. Soft power and Russian Foreign Policy. Rowman & Littlefield. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216402015
World Council of Churches. (2025). Russian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate). https://www.oikoumene.org/member-churches/russian-orthodox-church-moscow-patriarchate
Yakunin, G. (2002). Historical path of Orthodox fundamentalism. Vehi. http://vehi.net/politika/yakunin.html#_ftn1
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Pkhaladze Tengiz

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Os autores que publicam na Revista Transdisciplinaria de Estudios Sociales y Tecnológicos (RTEST), concordam com os seguintes termos:
1. Direitos autorais
Os autores mantêm direitos autorais irrestritos sobre suas obras. Os autores concedem ao periódico o direito de primeira publicação. Para tal, cedem à revista, em caráter não exclusivo, direitos de exploração (reprodução, distribuição, comunicação pública e transformação). Os autores podem firmar acordos adicionais para a distribuição não exclusiva da versão publicada do trabalho no periódico, desde que haja reconhecimento de sua publicação inicial nesta revista.
© Os autores.
2. Licença
Os trabalhos são publicados na revista sob a licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Os termos podem ser encontrados em: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.pt
Esta licença permite:
- Compartilhar: copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer meio ou formato.
- Adaptar: remixar, transformar e desenvolver o material.
Nos seguintes termos:
- Atribuição: Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, fornecer um link para a licença e indicar se alguma alteração foi feita. Você pode fazer isso de qualquer maneira razoável, mas não de uma forma que sugira que o licenciante endossa ou patrocina seu uso.
- Não comercial: você não pode usar o material para fins comerciais.
- Compartilhamento pela mesma licença: se você remixar, transformar ou criar a partir do material, deverá distribuir sua criação sob a mesma licença do trabalho original.
Não há restrições adicionais. Você não pode aplicar termos legais ou medidas tecnológicas que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem qualquer coisa que a licença permita.









